Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Aloe vera vs Formocresol as a Pulpotomy Medicament in Primary Molars: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Autor: | Divya Subramanyam, Sujatha Somasundaram |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Molar
Double blinded Radiography Pulpotomy Dentistry Orthodontics Asymptomatic Aloe vera law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Randomized controlled trial law hemic and lymphatic diseases Medicine 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine biology business.industry 030206 dentistry biology.organism_classification Clinical trial Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Periodontics Oral Surgery medicine.symptom business |
Zdroj: | International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 13:138-143 |
ISSN: | 0975-1904 0974-7052 |
Popis: | Aim The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical and radiographic success of Aloe vera and formocresol (FC) as a pulpotomy medicament in primary molars. Materials and methods A total of 72 asymptomatic or symptomatic vital primary molars were selected and were assigned to two groups: group II: Buckley's FC, group II: Aloe vera gel. The clinical and radiographic success were evaluated using Zurn and Seale criteria. The data were statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test. Results At three and 6 months follow-up, the clinical success rate of Aloe vera and FC was equally effective. Aloe vera showed a higher radiographic success rate compared to FC (p > 0.05). At 6 months follow-up, FC showed a higher radiographic success rate compared to Aloe vera (p > 0.05). Conclusion The clinical and radiographic success of both groups were equally effective at the end of 6 months follow-up. Aloe vera can be considered as an alternative pulpotomy medicament to FC. But, further long-term follow-up studies and histological studies are required. How to cite this article Subramanyam D, Somasundaram S. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Aloe vera vs Formocresol as a Pulpotomy Medicament in Primary Molars: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(2):138-143. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |