| Popis: |
Numerous investigators have proposed rules, principles, and definitions that allow reliable analyses of dermatoglyphics. The earlier proposals have been reviewed by Cummins and Midlo (1961). Their monograph served as the most comprehensive guide to dermatoglyphic analysis for more than three decades.1 When a relationship was reported between unusual dermatoglyphic features and certain chromosomal abnormalities, interest in dermatoglyphic analysis increased rapidly. The widespread interest in this field and a need for a standardized dermatoglyphic terminology stimulated an international symposium. As a result, a “Memorandum on Dermatoglyphic Nomenclature” was published (Penrose, 1968). The memorandum listed and defined dermatoglyphic features, outlined accepted methods of dermatoglyphic analysis, and provided a nomenclature that was intended to serve as a universal standard. The more subtle aspects of dermatoglyphics, which were previously dealt with in detail by Cummins and Midlo (1961) were not included in the memorandum. |
