Triple-low Alerts Do Not Reduce Mortality
| Autor: | Daniel I. Sessler, Jacek B. Cywinski, Sean Drahuschak, Kristina Kaple, Ehab Farag, Mauricio Perilla, Claudene Vlah, Wolf H. Stapelfeldt, Alparslan Turan, Allen L. Keebler, Dongsheng Yang, Tatyana Kopyeva, Andrea Kurz, Edward J. Mascha, Mangakalaraip Ramachandran |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Mean arterial pressure business.industry Volatile anesthetic Hazard ratio Hemodynamics law.invention 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Randomized controlled trial 030202 anesthesiology law Bispectral index Emergency medicine Medicine business Lead (electronics) Noncardiac surgery 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Anesthesiology. 130:72-82 |
| ISSN: | 0003-3022 |
| DOI: | 10.1097/aln.0000000000002480 |
| Popis: | EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE What We Already Know about This Topic Intraoperative triple-low events (mean arterial pressure less than 75 mmHg, Bispectral Index less than 45, and minimum alveolar fraction of anesthetic less than 0.8) have been found to be associated with increased risk of mortality What This Article Tells Us That Is New A randomized electronic alert of triple-low events to treating clinicians did not reduce 90-day mortality The alerts minimally influenced clinician responses, assessed as vasopressor administration or reduction in end-tidal volatile anesthetic partial pressure, and there was no association between response to alerts and mortality Triple-low events predict mortality but do not appear to be causally related Background Triple-low events (mean arterial pressure less than 75 mmHg, Bispectral Index less than 45, and minimum alveolar fraction less than 0.8) are associated with mortality but may not be causal. This study tested the hypothesis that providing triple-low alerts to clinicians reduces 90-day mortality. Methods Adults having noncardiac surgery with volatile anesthesia and Bispectral Index monitoring were electronically screened for triple-low events. Patients having triple-low events were randomized in real time, with clinicians either receiving an alert, “consider hemodynamic support,” or not. Patients were blinded to treatment. Helpful responses to triple-low events were defined by administration of a vasopressor within 5 min or a 20% reduction in end-tidal volatile anesthetic concentration within 15 min. Results Of the qualifying patients, 7,569 of 36,670 (20%) had triple-low events and were randomized. All 7,569 were included in the primary analysis. Ninety-day mortality was 8.3% in the alert group and 7.3% in the nonalert group. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for alert versus nonalert was 1.14 (0.96, 1.35); P = 0.12, crossing a prespecified futility boundary. Clinical responses were helpful in about half the patients in each group, with 51% of alert patients and 47% of nonalert patients receiving vasopressors or having anesthetics lowered after start of triple low (P < 0.001). There was no relationship between the response to triple-low events and adjusted 90-day mortality. Conclusions Real-time alerts to triple-low events did not lead to a reduction in 90-day mortality, and there were fewer responses to alerts than expected. However, similar mortality with and without responses suggests that there is no strong relationship between responses to triple-low events and mortality. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|