Lifting lower bounds for tree-like proofs
Autor: | Phuong Nguyen, Alexis Maciel, Toniann Pitassi |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: |
Discrete mathematics
Proofs involving the addition of natural numbers Proof complexity General Mathematics Boolean circuit Sequent calculus Mathematical proof Computational hardness assumption Upper and lower bounds Theoretical Computer Science Combinatorics Computational Mathematics TheoryofComputation_MATHEMATICALLOGICANDFORMALLANGUAGES Computational Theory and Mathematics Probabilistically checkable proof Mathematics |
Zdroj: | computational complexity. 23:585-636 |
ISSN: | 1420-8954 1016-3328 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00037-013-0064-x |
Popis: | It is known that constant-depth Frege proofs of some tautologies require exponential size. No such lower bound result is known for more general proof systems. We consider tree-like sequent calculus proofs in which formulas can contain modular connectives and only the cut formulas are restricted to be of constant depth. Under a plausible hardness assumption concerning small-depth Boolean circuits, we prove exponential lower bounds for such proofs. We prove these lower bounds directly from the computational hardness assumption. We start with a lower bound for cut-free proofs and "lift" it so it applies to proofs with constant-depth cuts. By using the same approach, we obtain the following additional results. We provide a much simpler proof of a known unconditional lower bound in the case where modular connectives are not used. We establish a conditional exponential separation between the power of constant-depth proofs that use different modular connectives. We show that these tree-like proofs with constant-depth cuts cannot polynomially simulate similar dag-like proofs, even when the dag-like proofs are cut-free. We present a new proof of the non-finite axiomatizability of the theory of bounded arithmetic I Δ0(R). Finally, under a plausible hardness assumption concerning the polynomial-time hierarchy, we show that the hierarchy $${G_i^*}$$ of quantified propositional proof systems does not collapse. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |