Selection of induction chemotherapy (CT) in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer by positron emission tomography (PET)

Autor: J. Pleguezuelos, E. Gonzalez, Julio Delgado, A. Irigoyen, P. Reche, A. Rodriguez, J. Ferron, Casilda Rodríguez, V. Conde, Raquel Luque
Rok vydání: 2006
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 24:14041-14041
ISSN: 1527-7755
0732-183X
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.14041
Popis: 14041 Background: Preoperative CT improves survival in esophageal cancer. 50% of patients (pts) do not respond to cisplatin+5-FU (C+F). The reduction of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake after 14 days (d) of CT predicts clinical response (rsp). Our objective was to measure the rsp (rsp) rate after CT adjusted according to PET rsp. Methods: Eligible pts were ≥ stage II esophageal cancer and able to tolerate CT. By adjusting CT according to PET rsp, we expected an increase of rsp rate by 25%. Taking into account a confidence level of 90%, an error β of 20% and a minimal error of 15% (even with such a high error rate the data will exceed the standard results), we calculated a sample size of 23 pts. All underwent esophagoscopy, computed tomography and PET scan prior to C (100mg/m2 d1) +5-FU (1,000mg/m2 d1–5). If PET rsp after first cycle (uptake decreased ≥ 35%), we continued up to third C+F cycle, then if endoscopy rsp: C+F + concurrent radiation only if stage II or III. If no endoscopy rsp, surgery only if stage II or III. On the other hand, if the pts had no rsp in PET after first C+F cycle they continued with 2 cycles of docetaxel (35mg/m2 d 1 & 8) and irinotecan (50mg/m2 d 1 & 8) (D+I) every 21 d and then if endoscopy rsp: radiation + docetaxel only if stage II or III. If no endoscopy rsp, surgery. Results: Since 2/04, 23 pts have been enrolled. Location: 2 cervical, 4 upper thoracic, 7 mid-thoracic, 10 GE junction. PET stage: 7 IIA, 6 IIB, 2 III, 2 IVA, 6 IVB. Up-staging with PET in 6 pts, down-staging in 4 pts. Histology: 10 Adenocarcinoma, 13 squamous carcinoma. Improved swallowing function: from a total of 12 PET responders, 9 had a clinical rsp after C+F, 3 did not. From 11 PET non-responders, 7 had a clinical rsp after D+I, 4 did not. Global clinical rsp = 16/23 (70%). Endoscopy rsp (frequent inaccuracy by overstaging): from a total of 12 PET responders, 6 had a clinical rsp after C+F, 6 did not. From 11 PET non-responders, 7 had a clinical rsp after D+I, 4 did not. Global clinical rsp = 13/23 (57%). Conclusion: Our results suggest that it is possible to significantly increase the percentage of pts who respond to induction CT adjusted according to PET in esophagogastric cancer before concurrent chemoradiotherapy or esophagectomy, or both. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: