Examining Curriculum-Based Measurement Screening Tools in Middle School Science: A Scaled Replication Study
| Autor: | Erica S. Lembke, R. Alex Smith, John L. Hosp, Jeremy W. Ford, Sarah J. Conoyer, Erica N. Mason |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Predictive validity
05 social sciences 050401 social sciences methods 050301 education Test validity computer.software_genre Education Clinical Psychology Engineering management Curriculum-based measurement 0504 sociology Educational assessment Replication (statistics) Criterion validity Psychology 0503 education computer Curriculum General Psychology At-risk students |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 37:887-898 |
| ISSN: | 1557-5144 0734-2829 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0734282918803493 |
| Popis: | This replication study examined the alternate form reliability, criterion validity, and predictive utility of two curriculum-based measurement (CBM) tools in science, Vocabulary-Matching (VM) and Statement Verification for Science (SV-S), for the purpose of screening. In all, 205 seventh-grade students from four middle schools were given alternate forms of each science CBM tool. Scores from the Idaho Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) science assessment were obtained. Stronger evidence of reliability and validity with the ISAT was found for VM compared with SV-S. With regard to predictive utility, VM more accurately classified students’ at-risk status compared with SV-S for identifying proficiency on the ISAT. Practical implications and directions for future research are also discussed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|