Testing Results and a Proposed Treatment Plan for Further Work on the Thompson Draw FLEX Project in Tonto National Forest, Gila County, Arizona
Autor: | Deil R. Lundin, Mitchell, Douglas R., North, Chris D., Peterson, Kathleen, Wenker, Chris T. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2001 |
Předmět: |
AZ O:12:85 (ASM)
Star Valley AZ Sacaton Phase Artifact Scatter Whiteware Animal Bone Archaeological Overview AZ O:12:82 (ASM) AZ O:12:81 (ASM) Sedentary Period Ground Stone Analysis Early Agricultural period Archaeological Feature Redware Gila and Salt River Baseline and Meridian Gila County Hohokam Flake Tool Fauna Ground Stone Tonto National Forest Colonial Period AZ O:12:83 (ASM) Red-on-Buff Tonto Basin AZ O:12:80 (ASM) Plainware Core AR-03-12-04-1450 (TNF) Site Evaluation / Testing Pit House / Earth Lodge Ceramic Analysis Snaketown Phase AR-03-12-04-1403 (TNF) Mano Lithic Analysis Arizona (State / Territory) AR-03-12-04-1521 (TNF) Records Search / Inventory Checking Huhugam AZ O:12:84 (ASM) Historic Background Research Axe Treatment Plan AR-03-12-04-1449 (TNF) Chipped Stone Thompson Draw Flex Project Black-on-white Ceramic AR-03-12-04-1397 (TNF) Research Design / Data Recovery Plan Archaic AR-03-12-04-1385 (TNF) Quartzite |
DOI: | 10.48512/xcv8441091 |
Popis: | Test excavations were conducted at six sites to determine their National Register eligibility, prior to a land exchange. Three of the sites, AR-03-12-04-1397/AZ 0:12:81 (ASM), AR-03 -12-04-1403/AZ 0:12:82 (ASM), and AR-03-12-04-1521/AZ 0:12:85 (ASM), demonstrated low overall artifact density, small site size and an absence of subsurface features, and are therefore recommended as ineligible for National Register consideration. AR-03-12-04-13 85/AZ 0:12:80 (ASM) and AR-03-12-04-1449/AZ 0:12:83 (ASM), demonstrated a moderate to high artifact density, high artifact diversity and medium to large site size. These sites are recommended as eligible for inclusion to the National Register. AR-03-12-04-1450/AZ 0:12:84 (ASM) evidenced a moderate artifact density and large site size. This site requires more research before its eligibility status can be determined. Further archaeological work is recommended for sites 1385/80, 1449/83 and 1450/84 prior to executing this land exchange. No further work is recommended for sites 1397/81, 1403/82 and 1521/85. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |