Post-treatment (not interim) positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan status is highly predictive of outcome in mantle cell lymphoma patients treated with R-HyperCVAD
Autor: | Paul M. Lizotte, Anthony R. Mato, Sunita D. Nasta, Jakub Svoboda, Andre Goy, Mitchell Miller, Andrew L. Pecora, Steven R. Schuster, Tania Zielonka, Tatyana Feldman, Harry Agress, David Panush, Stuart L. Goldberg, Patrick Toth, Emeline Chong |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2011 |
Předmět: |
Oncology
Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Vincristine medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Hazard ratio Cancer Retrospective cohort study medicine.disease Confidence interval Positron emission tomography Internal medicine Cohort medicine Mantle cell lymphoma business Nuclear medicine medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Cancer. 118:3565-3570 |
ISSN: | 0008-543X |
DOI: | 10.1002/cncr.26731 |
Popis: | BACKGROUND: Although convincing data exist regarding the prognostic utility of positron emission tomographic (PET)-computed tomographic (CT) imaging in Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, its prognostic utility both during treatment and immediately after treatment have not been systematically evaluated in a large mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patient cohort to support its use in clinical practice. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine the prognostic utility of PET-CT imaging in a uniform MCL patient cohort undergoing dose-intensive chemotherapy (R-HyCVAD) in the frontline setting. The primary study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PET-CT images were centrally reviewed for the purposes of this study using standardized response criteria. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with advanced stage MCL with PET-CT data were identified. With median follow-up of 32 months, 3-year PFS and OS estimates were 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64%-84%) and 84% (95% CI, 72%-90%), respectively. Interim PET-CT status was not associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.9; 95% CI, 0.3-2.7; P = .8) or OS (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.1-2.9; P = .5). Post-treatment PET-CT status was statistically significantly associated with PFS (HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.0-13.6; P = .001) and trended toward significant for OS (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.8-9.6; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: These data do not support the prognostic utility of PET-CT in pretreatment and interim treatment settings. A positive PET-CT after the completion of therapy identifies a patient subset with an inferior PFS and a trend toward inferior OS. Cancer 2012;3565–3570. © 2011 American Cancer Society. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |