Which test is a better strategy to determine the outcome of atypical glandular cell-categorized Pap smears? Immunocytochemical p16 expression or human papillomavirus test—A retrospective cohort study
Autor: | Ya-Wen Lin, Shih Fang Yang, Chien Yu Bai, Shin Nieh, Su-Feng Chen, Tang Yuan Chu, Hung Cheng Lai |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2005 |
Předmět: |
Pathology
medicine.medical_specialty biology business.industry Immunocytochemistry Obstetrics and Gynecology Retrospective cohort study medicine.disease female genital diseases and pregnancy complications Atypical Glandular Cell Lesion Oncology medicine biology.protein Adenocarcinoma Antibody medicine.symptom Human papillomavirus business Viral load |
Zdroj: | Gynecologic Oncology. 99:578-584 |
ISSN: | 0090-8258 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.060 |
Popis: | Objective. This study was to correlate high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) viral load to p16 INK4A (p16) expression in atypical glandular cell (AGC)-categorized Pap smears with follow-up biopsies for elucidating their relationships. Methods. We enrolled 36 AGC-categorized Pap smears with subsequent follow-up biopsies. HR-HPV viral load was determined by Hybrid Capture II assay in each AGC-diagnosed Pap smear. Both smears and biopsies were immunostained with a primary anti-p16 antibody, clone E6H4. Correlations between HR-HPV viral load in each AGC-diagnosed Pap smear and p16 expression of smears with follow-up biopsies were performed. Results. Comparative analysis of two tests disclosed both consistencies and discrepancies. There were significant differences ( P = 0.02) between negative or weak p16 expression of Pap smears with the presence of reactive lesion or LSILs/CIN1s in follow-up biopsies and negative HR-HPV viral load. However, no significant difference ( P = 0.317) was found between p16 expression of Pap smears with the presence of HSIL/CIN2, 3 and AIS or adenocarcinoma in follow-up biopsies and high HR-HPV viral load. In addition, there were significant differences ( P = 0.012) in specificity, but no significant differences were found in sensitivity ( P = 0.604), positive and negative predictive value ( P = 0.066 and 0.264) between p16 immunoexpression and HR-HPV viral load. Conclusions. Pathogenic activity of HR-HPV was indicated by p16 expression on smears and tissue sections, which appears to be a better strategy than HR-HPV viral load test for the detection of clinically insignificant lesions from AGC-categorized Pap smears. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |