| Popis: |
The snowballing development of genetic and machine learning technologies and the use of the results of such developments in different areas of social life poses serious problems as to setting limits for their application. It is necessary to find an acceptable balance between various interests: scientific progress, the right of society to security and an improvement in the quality of life, commercial interests, the right to information, freedom and privacy. The fundamental nature of the ethical and legal issues arising in the transition to a new technological paradigm, the lack of ready-made solutions, the “slow” development of legislation, which does not keep pace with the current state and prospects for the progress and use of technologies, lead to a situation when judiciary bodies are entrusted to search for a balance between public and private interests in this area. This paper provides a comparative analysis of two similar cases which have passed through the national judicial bodies of the United Kingdom and Russia. These claims are for rights protection related to the use of identity recognition technologies. Based on this, it is considered how the judicial activity of national courts and its quality affects the change in legal reality, regulation and law enforcement in the field of the use of new technologies. |
