Using implementation science to initiate survivorship care plan practice change
| Autor: | Betty Goracke Olguin, Lindsay L. Benes |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Clinical Oncology. 36:175-175 |
| ISSN: | 1527-7755 0732-183X |
| DOI: | 10.1200/jco.2018.36.34_suppl.175 |
| Popis: | 175 Background: Failure to address coordination of cancer survivorship care can result in physical disability, emotional distress, and increased health care costs. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended Survivorship Care Plans (SCPs) to improve care coordination among cancer survivors. Despite evidence supporting SCPs there remains limited implementation of SCPs. The use of implementation science, frameworks, and strategies that address contextual and process factors, could improve use of SCPs in oncology clinics (Selove et al., 2016). Methods: This innovation used the Quality Implementation Framework (QIF) (Meyers, Durlak, & Wandersman, 2012) to guide implementation. The QIF outlines steps and strategies for four phases of implementation; initial considerations regarding the host setting, creating a structure for implementation, ongoing structure once implementation begins, and improving future application. Results: During the project period (January 29, 2018 through April 23, 2018), 17 SCP visits were conducted; all 17 patients completed study surveys. In response to, “My health care providers work together as a team to ensure that my needs are met,” 65% reported strongly agree, 29% reported agree, 5% reported disagree, and 0% reported strongly disagree. When asked “My health care providers have informed me of what my follow-up care should be” 65% reported strongly agree and 35% reported agree. Of the 17 PCP surveys mailed, four were returned. In response to “For this patient the SCP helps me coordinate follow-up care,” three PCPs responded “agree.” When asked “For this patient, the SCP helps me provide better care,” three responded “strongly agree.” One PCP reported neutral feelings toward both statements. All PCPs reported SCP helped them better understand cancer treatment given and side effects. Conclusions: Successful SCP implementation, replicating outcomes of trials supporting SCPs, is attributable to the use of implementation science. Results from this project demonstrated SCPs achieved care coordination and patient satisfaction. SCPs enhanced PCPs’ understanding of cancer treatment and side effects which could increase likelihood PCPs discuss survivorship issues, as demonstrated in literature. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|