| Popis: |
Inter-Session -Processes (ISP) have been described as a significant factors of influence in the Generic Model of Psychotherapy (Orlinsky, 2009). As they are conceptualized as mental representations of in-session processes and the therapist as a person, they occur in diverse modalities (haptic, imagery, conceptual; Geller et al., 1981; Knox et al., 1999) and are experienced by most patients (Orlinsky et al., 1993). Although there are questionnaires and interviews with which ISP are surveyed (Geller, Smith, Cooley & Hartley 1981; Orlinsky et al., 1993; Knox et al., 1999 ) it is still unclear, how ISP are utilized and experienced by individual patients. In this project, we use qualitative interviews to examine the experience and utilization of ISP in patients at the Center for Psychological Psychotherapy of the university of Greifswald (ZPP). Sources: Geller, J. D., Cooley, R. S., & Hartley, D. (1981). Images of the Psychotherapist: A theoretical and methodological perspective. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 1(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.2190/64EY-QLW8-765A-K0KH Knox, S., Goldberg, J. L., Woodhouse, S. S., & Hill, C. E. (1999). Clients’ internal representations of their therapists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(2), 244–256. https://doi.org/10/fxhnd8 Orlinsky, D. E. (2009). The “Generic Model of Psychotherapy” after 25 years: Evolution of a research-based metatheory. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 19(4), 319–339. https://doi.org/10/bch6qn Orlinsky, D. E., Geller, J. D., Tarragona, M., & Farber, B. (1993). Patients’ representations of psychotherapy: A new focus for psychodynamic research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.596 |
