| Popis: |
This study examines whether 3-year-olds are able to use ontological distinctions in homophone and nonce word acquisition. In the homophone (denotation-1 present) condition, children heard stories introducing second meanings of homophones; for example, a skate (i.e., fish). Stories contained perceptual information, information about theory-based properties, or filler material. Children identified the referent from 3 drawings depicting the familiar meaning, the secondary meaning, and a distractor. In the homophone (denotation-1 absent) condition, the picture of the familiar meaning was replaced with a distractor. The nonce word condition, a control condition, was identical to the homophone (denotation-1 present) condition except that a nonce word replaced the homophone. Children were rarely able to construct a second homophone interpretation when the familiar denotation was available. Interestingly, in the remaining conditions, children used information about the animate-inanimate distinction in choosing the referent. We discuss children's use of this ontological distinction when inducing word meaning. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect