A Report of Submucosal Intravascular Paraganglioma of the Gallbladder and Review of the Literature

Autor: David Webb, Brian Bennett
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 152:S86-S86
ISSN: 1943-7722
0002-9173
DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz117.002
Popis: Objectives The purpose of this case study and review of the literature is to allow pathologists to recall an appropriate differential diagnosis for submucosal epithelial tumors of the gallbladder. It is also important to note the immunohistochemical evaluation of a paraganglioma. Methods Intraoperative findings were multiple adhesions of the omentum to the gallbladder itself, with a mildly dilated cystic duct measuring 6 to 7 mm externally. The intraoperative cholangiogram was normal with no evidence of retained stones. The gallbladder was 9.5 cm and essentially unremarkable with no stones upon gross examination. Palpation revealed a 5 × 4 × 4-mm gray-tan cystic duct lymph node that was microscopically unremarkable. Microscopically, there was a 2.7-mm submucosal intravascular epithelioid tumor. Cytologically, the cellular infiltrate was cohesive, filled, and expanded a single submucosal vessel. A broad panel of immunohistochemical stains was performed, with the results listed below. Results Carbonic anhydrase IX: Negative; Monoclonal CEA: Negative; CK7: Negative; CK 20: Negative; Gata-3: Positive; Mart-1: Negative; OCT3/4: Strong diffuse positive; P 63: Negative; Pancytokeratin: Negative; PAX-8: Negative; S-100: Negative; WT1: Negative; PLAP: Negative; Hep par 1: Negative; AFP: Negative; CD117: Negative; CD 30: Negative; CDX2: Negative; Glypican 3: Negative; SALL4: Negative; Inhibin: Negative ERG: Negative; CD34: Negative; CD56: Strong diffuse positive; Synaptophysin: Strong diffuse positive; Chromogranin: Strong diffuse positive. Conclusion Expert opinion was requested to confirm the presumed diagnosis on this case. The consulting pathologist was in agreement that this was best classified as an intravascular paraganglioma. The patient was seen in follow-up and a CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was ordered. Interestingly, a 1.9-cm enhancing upper pole right renal mass was identified. The patient was sent to urologic surgical consultation in which they believed this tumor to represent a stage 1a primary renal cell carcinoma and subsequently sent for radiofrequency ablation.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: