No effect of ovarian stimulation and oocyte yield on euploidy and live birth rates: an analysis of 12 298 trophectoderm biopsies
Autor: | B Maddy, Mohamad Irani, X Qin, Kangpu Xu, Zev Rosenwaks, C. Zhang, V. Gunnala, C. Canon, Alex Robles |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine In vitro fertilisation medicine.drug_class media_common.quotation_subject medicine.medical_treatment Rehabilitation Obstetrics and Gynecology Aneuploidy Biology medicine.disease Embryo transfer Andrology 03 medical and health sciences Follicle 030104 developmental biology 0302 clinical medicine medicine.anatomical_structure Reproductive Medicine medicine Gonadotropin Ovarian follicle Live birth Ovulation media_common |
Zdroj: | Human Reproduction. 35:1082-1089 |
ISSN: | 1460-2350 0268-1161 |
DOI: | 10.1093/humrep/deaa028 |
Popis: | STUDY QUESTION Does ovarian stimulation affect embryo euploidy rates or live birth rates (LBRs) after transfer of euploid embryos? SUMMARY ANSWER Euploidy rates and LBRs after transfer of euploid embryos are not significantly influenced by gonadotropin dosage, duration of ovarian stimulation, estradiol level, follicle size at ovulation trigger or number of oocytes retrieved, regardless of a woman’s age. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Aneuploidy rates increase steadily with age, reaching >80% in women >42 years old. The goal of ovarian stimulation is to overcome this high aneuploidy rate through the recruitment of several follicles, which increases the likelihood of obtaining a euploid embryo that results in a healthy conceptus. However, several studies have suggested that a high response to stimulation might be embryotoxic and/or increase aneuploidy rates by enhancing abnormal segregation of chromosomes during meiosis. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated a remarkable difference in euploidy rates, ranging from 39.5 to 82.5%, among young oocyte donors in 42 fertility centres, potentially suggesting an iatrogenic etiology resulting from different stimulation methods. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a retrospective cohort study that included 2230 in vitro fertilisation (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles and 930 frozen-thawed single euploid embryo transfer (FET) cycles, performed in our centre between 2013 and 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 12 298 embryos were analysed for ploidy status. Women were divided into five age groups (42 years old). Outcomes were compared between different durations of stimulation (6000 IU), numbers of oocytes retrieved (3000 pg/mL), and sizes of the largest follicle on the day of trigger ( MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Within the same age group, both euploidy rates and LBRs were comparable between cycles regardless of their differences in total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation, number of oocytes harvested, size of the largest follicles or peak estradiol levels. In the youngest group, (6000 IU; P = 0.3), durations of stimulation (54.4% for 12 days; P = 0.2), number of oocytes harvested (59.4% for 3000 pg/mL; P = 0.9) and sizes of the largest follicle (55.6% for follicles 42 years, n = 1157 embryos), euploidy rates ranged from 8.7% for gonadotropins 6000 IU (P = 0.3), from 10.8% for 12 days of stimulation (P = 0.3), from 7.3% for 3000 pg/mL (P = 0.8) and from 8.2% for the largest follicle LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although this large study (2230 IVF/PGT-A cycles, 12 298 embryos and 930 single FET cycles) demonstrates the safety of ovarian stimulation in terms of aneuploidy and implantation potential of euploid embryos, a multi-centre study may help to prove the generalisability of our single-centre data. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These findings reassure providers and patients that gonadotropin dosage, duration of ovarian stimulation, estradiol level, follicle size at ovulation trigger and number of oocytes retrieved, within certain ranges, do not appear to significantly influence euploidy rates or LBRs, regardless of the woman’s age. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was received and there are no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |