Autor: |
Gerry McKenna, Jayne V. Woodside, Bernadette McGuinness, Leigh-Ann McCrum, Sinead Watson, Laura McGowan, Mike Clarke, Christopher Cardwell |
Rok vydání: |
2020 |
Předmět: |
|
Popis: |
BackgroundOlder adults suffering partial tooth loss may need additional intervention strategies other than oral rehabilitation alone to improve their nutritional status. This study aimed to design and develop a habit-based tailored dietary intervention and to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, in conjunction with oral rehabilitation, amongst partially dentate older adults.MethodsThe design and development of the dietary intervention (Phase 1) consisted of analysis of the target population’s dietary intake and qualitative research through focus groups with community-dwelling older adults (aged 65 years and over). Feasibility of the intervention was then tested among older adults receiving oral rehabilitation in a small non-randomised single arm study (Phase 2). The primary feasibility outcome was the usability and acceptability of the intervention which was measured using evaluation questionnaires and by conducting post-intervention semi-structured interviews. Secondary outcomes consisted of feasibility of screening procedures; recruitment strategies; and retention/ attrition rates as well as the participant’s compliance to the intervention assessed through self-monitoring tracking sheets.ResultsTwenty-one older adults (mean [SD] age 72.1 [10.4].) took part in one of four focus group discussions (Phase 1). Twelve themes related to barriers (e.g oral health, appetite) and facilitators (e.g nutritional knowledge, retirement) of healthy eating guided intervention development, as did a further five themes when asked for direct intervention feedback. Nine older adult participants (mean [SD] age 72.5[9.7]) were recruited into the feasibility study (Phase 2) where eight themes were identified from feedback interview discussions. Primary outcome measures identified intervention feasibility as participants considered the intervention acceptable and useable as both the evaluation questionnaire and qualitative interview results were overwhelmingly positive. As a secondary outcome measure, strong intervention compliance was also achieved. Screening procedures were accepted but additional recruitment strategies (e.g incorporation of home study visits or recruitment via posters advertisement) may benefit future study enrolment and retention.ConclusionPhase 1 and Phase 2 findings have allowed for an iterative, user-driven intervention to be developed and refined for a randomised control study to evaluate the intervention’s effectiveness.Trial registration: ISRCTN66118345 |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|