'Dreadful thoughts': The tenth anniversary of the Levin petition

Autor: Terrance Dunford
Rok vydání: 1999
Předmět:
Zdroj: Academic Questions. 12:65-71
ISSN: 1936-4709
0895-4852
Popis: I n 1988, Richard Levin, Professor of English at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, wrote an essay for the Publications of the Modem Language Association (PMI-4) explaining his objections to feminist literary criticism. The react ion f rom feminist literary critics that ensued revealed how politicized literary scholarship had become dur ing the 1970s and 1980s and how literary theory was transforming into political activism. It has been ten years since the feminist literary critics launched their assault on Professor Levin, and it would be enl ightening to revisit the tactics in tended to int imidate literary scholars who failed to acknowledge the political goals of radical academics. It is hard to measure what success, if any, feminist literary critics were able to realize f rom their attack on Professor Levin, but it surely must have been more than apparent ten years ago to n o n t e n u r e d literature teachers, graduate students, and depar tment cha i rmen that scholars risked the oppor tuni ty to publish if they dared, like Professor Levin, to find fault with feminist literary criticism. In his essay, titled "Feminist Thematics and Shakespearian Tragedy," Levin argued that feminist literary criticism, since it emerged dur ing the mid-1970s, suffered from an overreliance on thematics, the reduct ion of complex works of literature to a handful of simple and persistent themes.1 (Such an objection was consistent with Professor Levin's similar complaints in his 1979 New Readings vs. Old Plays that thematic studies deprive Shakespeare's plays of their complexity and originality. For the thematic critic, Professor Levin argued, the significance of Shakespeare's plays always resides e lsewhere-in contemporary documents , religious controversies, or topical events -but no t in the words that Shakespeare wrote.) In his PMIA essay, Professor Levin similarly observed that "the themes employed in [feminist] interpretat ions are basically the same. Although the terminology may vary, these criticisms all f ind that [Shakespeare's] plays are about the role of gender in the individual and society" (125). Insisting that Shakespeare's plays are really about gender themes not only obscures o ther and richer interpretations, Professor Levin argued, but feminist literary critics too often ignore the facts of the plays. For example, Professor Levin cited one feminist literary critic who wrote that King Lear's rejection of his daughter in the first act of King Lear is a social n o r m for the patriarchal father-daughter relationship. Yet, observed Levin, "the witnesses to this relat ionship--Kent, Gloucester, Burgundy, France, even Goneril and
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje