Assessment of end-of-life care quality indicators in veterans with cancer

Autor: Giselle A. Suero-Abreu, Fengming Zhong, Camille Johnson, Marshall McKenna, Arturo Perez, Shanthi Srinivas, Aldo Barajas-Ochoa, Piyumika De Silva, Victor T. Chang, Jun Chih Wang
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 37:e18327-e18327
ISSN: 1527-7755
0732-183X
Popis: e18327 Background: Many cancer patients (pts) receive aggressive medical care at the end-of-life (EOL) . The objective of this study was to assess quality of EOL (qEOL) care in cancer pts at our VA and to determine the implementation of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. Methods: Records of Veterans followed at the VA NJ Health Care System who died from 2015-2017 were reviewed. The qEOL care was assessed using seven indicators by Earle et al. ( J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(6):1133-1138). EOL planning (use of DNRs and use of palliative and hospice services) was also assessed. Results: We identified 92 male pts with cancer (mean age 73 years ±10). There were Caucasian (n = 48, 52%) and African American (n = 38, 41%) pts. The most common malignancies were lung (22%), gastrointestinal (21%), prostate (16%) and hematological (14%). 87 pts (95%) had a DNR order at the time of death; the DNR was obtained a median of 60 days prior (IQR 7-135). Ten pts (11%) had DNR orders placed within 1 week of death. Seven pts (8%) received chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life while 6 pts (7%) received a new treatment in their last 30 days. In the last month of life, 35 pts (38%) had multiple hospitalizations and ER visits, 20 pts (22%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, 9 pts (10%) were intubated, and 3 pts [3%] received cardiopulmonary resuscitation. More pts (n = 47, 51%) died in an acute care setting, and 45 (49%) pts were admitted to hospice (median of 22 days before death, IQR 6-52). Four pts (4%) were admitted to hospice within 3 days of death. A next-of-kin was available for 64 pts (70%). Palliative care (PC) was provided to 83 pts (90%) and pain medications prescribed for 80 pts (87%). Conclusions: There was timely implementation of DNRs and referral to PC. The qEOL indicators used suggest that aggressive treatments were appropriately being held at the EOL. However, there was an increased use of acute care services. Limitations include lack of data on Veterans who died outside the VA. This data supports future quality improvement EOL interventions. [Table: see text]
Databáze: OpenAIRE