Human rights concepts in the OSCE region: changes since the Helsinki Final Act

Autor:	Aaron Rhodes
Rok vydání:	2017
Předmět:	Human rights Linguistic rights media_common.quotation_subject Geography Planning and Development International community Fundamental rights Rights of Nature Development Right to property Politics International human rights law Law Sociology Earth-Surface Processes media_common
Zdroj:	Central Asian Survey. 36:313-330
ISSN:	1465-3354 0263-4937
DOI:	10.1080/02634937.2017.1281790
Popis:	The Helsinki Accords resonated with dissident movements in the Soviet Bloc that had reconstructed a classical liberal approach to human rights. Human rights campaigns on both sides of the Iron Curtain emphasized civil and political rights. But human rights revisionism, expanding the scope of human rights, was growing in international institutions. In 1993, the international community embraced the concept of the ‘indivisibility’ of human rights. An expansive, ‘post-modern’ vision of human rights de-emphasized the protection of basic individual freedoms, while expanding global regulation. A strong moral and political challenge to classical human rights has emerged in the form of Eurasianism, a statist doctrine that denies the existence of universal human rights and insists that each culture has its own values. The idea of human rights as protections for basic freedoms, diluted and weakened over decades by assaults and compromises, may lack the moral clarity needed to confront the Eurasian challenge.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::96031fea9555a6ad10ed6cc158a06de9 https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2017.1281790 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.