| Autor: |
Heiko Spallek, Benita Valappil, Marnie Oakley, Adriana Modesto, Jean A. O'Donnell, Deborah E. Polk |
| Rok vydání: |
2013 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
The Journal of the American Dental Association. 144:e24-e30 |
| ISSN: |
0002-8177 |
| DOI: |
10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0139 |
| Popis: |
Background The authors conducted a qualitative study of private-practice dentists in their offices by using vignette-based interviews to assess barriers to the use of evidence-based clinical recommendations in the treatment of noncavitated carious lesions. Methods The authors recruited 22 dentists as a convenience sample and presented them with two patient vignettes involving noncavitated carious lesions. Interviewers asked participants to articulate their thought processes as they described treatment recommendations. Participants compared their treatment plans with the American Dental Association's recommendations for sealing noncavitated carious lesions, and they described barriers to implementing these recommendations in their practices. The authors recorded and transcribed the sessions for accuracy and themes. Results Personal clinical experience emerged as the determining factor in dentists' treatment decisions regarding noncavitated carious lesions. Additional factors were lack of reimbursement and mistrust of the recommendations. The authors found that knowledge of the recommendations did not lead to their adoption when the recommendation was incongruent with the dentist's personal experience. Conclusions The authors found that ingrained practice behavior based on personal clinical experience that differed substantially from evidence-based recommendations resulted in a rejection of these recommendations. Practical Implications Attempts to improve the adoption of evidence-based practice must involve more than simple dissemination of information to achieve a balance between personal clinical experience and scientific evidence. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
