Nominal types in Gitksan split-absolutive agreement
Autor: | Clarissa Forbes |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
050101 languages & linguistics
Linguistics and Language Transitive relation Pronoun media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Nominative case 16. Peace & justice Language and Linguistics Linguistics Agreement 030507 speech-language pathology & audiology 03 medical and health sciences Subject (grammar) Ergative case 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Absolutive case Argument (linguistics) 0305 other medical science Mathematics media_common |
Zdroj: | Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. 39:1087-1128 |
ISSN: | 1573-0859 0167-806X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11049-020-09497-5 |
Popis: | This paper presents a study of a split absolutive-nominative agreement pattern in Gitksan (Tsimshianic) which co-occurs with ergative agreement. The split is conditioned on the basis of nominal type: alongside ergative agreement, a second type of agreement targets absolutives (S, O) when the subject is a participant or third-singular pronoun, or nominatives (S, A) when the subject is a full DP or third-plural pronoun. This results in what appears to be construction-dependent variation in the applicability of the Activity Condition, as some transitive subjects receive both ergative and nominative agreement. It is proposed that DP arguments and third-plural pronouns are able to receive multiple instances of agreement by virtue of bearing D-features; in contrast to the situation with typical pronouns, these D-features remain active for agreement even if prior ergative agreement has already deactivated the argument’s ϕ-features. Both ergative and nominative agreement may target a single argument because different groups of features are targeted during the two operations. The D-feature property is ultimately linked to a structural DP/non-DP distinction amongst arguments, providing some insight into the role of D in pronominal systems. This analysis, which crucially relies on an approach to activity that explicitly allows incremental deactivation of an argument, accounts for the empirical facts in Gitksan more readily than a purely morphological approach or an approach that considers distinctions between ϕ-features alone. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |