Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition
Autor: | Harry J. de Koning, Radu A. Manoliu, Cecile T. M. Brekelmans, Mieke Kriege, H. M. Zonderland, Theo Kok, Jan G. M. Klijn, Sara H. Muller, Carla Boetes, Inge Marie Obdeijn, Emiel J. Th. Rutgers |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2006 |
Předmět: |
Gynecology
Oncology Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty education.field_of_study medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Population Magnetic resonance imaging medicine.disease Breast cancer screening Breast cancer Internal medicine Tumor stage medicine Genetic predisposition Mammography business Ovarian cancer education |
Zdroj: | Cancer. 106:2318-2326 |
ISSN: | 0008-543X |
Popis: | BACKGROUND. Within the Dutch MRI Screening (MRISC) study, a Dutch multicenter screening study for hereditary breast cancer, the authors investigated whether previously reported increased diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with mammography would be maintained during subsequent screening rounds. METHODS. From November 1999 to October 2003, 1909 eligible women were included in the study. Screening parameters and tumor characteristics of different rounds were calculated and compared. The authors defined 3 different types of imaging screening rounds: first round in women never screened by imaging before, first round in women screened by imaging (mainly mammography) before, and subsequent rounds. RESULTS. The difference in sensitivity for invasive cancers between mammography and MRI was largest in the first round of women previously screened with mammography (20.0 vs. 93.3%; P = .003), but also in subsequent rounds, there was a significant difference in favor of MRI (29.4 vs. 76.5%; P = .02). The difference in false-positive rate between mammography and MRI was also largest in the first round of women previously screened with mammography (5.5 vs. 14.0%; P |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |