Invasive Stimulationsverfahren und EEG-Diagnostik bei Epilepsien
Autor: | Martin S. Hirsch, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, M. Hagge, Hajo M. Hamer |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Stimulation General Medicine Electroencephalography medicine.disease 03 medical and health sciences Psychiatry and Mental health Epilepsy 030104 developmental biology 0302 clinical medicine Neurology Anesthesia medicine Epilepsy surgery Neurology (clinical) Neurosurgery business Neurostimulation 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Vagus nerve stimulation Intracranial pressure |
Zdroj: | Der Nervenarzt. 87:829-837 |
ISSN: | 1433-0407 0028-2804 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00115-016-0159-0 |
Popis: | Stimulation has been performed experimentally and in small case series to treat epilepsy since the 1970s. Since the introduction of vagus nerve stimulation in 1997 and intracranial stimulation methods in 2011 into patient care, invasive stimulation has become a rapidly developing but infrequently used therapeutic option in Europe. Whereas vagus nerve stimulation is frequently used, particularly in the USA, intracranial stimulation differs in its regional availability. In order to improve the efficacy of stimulation, develop criteria for its use and assure low complication rates, a concentration on experienced centers and multicenter data acquisition and sharing are needed.Invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with subdural electrodes and especially with stereotactically implanted depth electrodes have been used increasingly more often for presurgical evaluation in recent years. They are applied when non-invasive diagnostics show insufficient results to exactly identify the location and extent of the epileptogenic zone or cannot be adequately distinguished from eloquent cortex areas. Complications include intracranial hemorrhage, infections and increased intracranial pressure but lasting deficits or even death are rare (≤2 %). The outcome of invasive monitoring is inferior to non-invasive monitoring because of the higher degree of complexity of the cases; however, it is far superior to the seizure-free rates achieved by anticonvulsant drug treatment alone. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |