Radiation belt electron flux variability during three CIR-driven geomagnetic storms
Autor: | Mai Mai Lam, Sarah A. Glauert, Nigel P. Meredith, Richard B. Horne |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2009 |
Předmět: |
Geomagnetic storm
Physics Atmospheric Science Hiss 010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences Flux Coronal hole Geophysics Solar maximum 01 natural sciences Computational physics symbols.namesake Solar wind 13. Climate action Space and Planetary Science Van Allen radiation belt Physics::Space Physics 0103 physical sciences symbols 010303 astronomy & astrophysics Intensity (heat transfer) 0105 earth and related environmental sciences |
Zdroj: | Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics. 71:1145-1156 |
ISSN: | 1364-6826 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jastp.2008.06.007 |
Popis: | Coronal holes produce high speed solar wind streams (HSS) that subsequently interact with the slower downstream solar wind forming co-rotating interaction regions (CIRs). The CIR/HSS combination drives geomagnetic storms that have a weak to moderate signature in D st . We simulate the behavior of relativistic (976 keV) electrons in the outer radiation belt and the slot region ( 2 ⩽ L ⩽ 7 ) during three CIR-driven storms associated with three consecutive rotations of a coronal hole that occurred just after solar maximum during June–August 1991. We use a 1d radial diffusion model (RADICAL) with losses due to pitch-angle scattering by plasmaspheric hiss. The losses are expressed through the electron lifetime calculated using the PADIE code driven by a global K p -dependent model of plasmaspheric hiss intensity and f pe / f ce . The outer boundary condition is time and energy-dependent and derived from observations. The model reproduces the observed flux at L = 5 to within about a factor of 3 suggesting that flux levels are well-described by radial diffusion to and from the outer boundary. At L = 3.5 and 4, the model overestimates the flux decay rates. This results in the observed flux exceeding the model flux, by up to a factor of 5 at L = 4 and by up to a factor of 8 at L = 3.5 , by the end of the recovery phase. Comparison with model results from a geomagnetically quieter interval suggest that the underestimation in flux may be due to the lack of representation of local wave acceleration in the model. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |