Nest Poaching in Neotropical Parrots
Autor: | Ernesto Enkerlin-Hoeflich, J. Michael Meyers, James Gilardi, Francisco J. Vilella, Angélica M. Rodríguez, Katherine Renton, Ana C. Sosa-Asanza, Ann T. Brice, James W. Wiley, Jessica R. Eberhard, Steven R. Beissinger, Scott H. Stoleson, Susan E. Koenig, Virginia Sanz, Kim Joyner, A Vicente Berovides, A Xiomara Gálvez, Adriana Rodríguez-Ferraro, Mariana Albornoz, Paulo Martuscelli, Franklin Rojas-Suárez, Catherine A. Toft, Ana Trujillo, Timothy F. Wright, Jaime Gonzalez-Elizondo |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2001 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Conservation Biology. 15:710-720 |
ISSN: | 1523-1739 0888-8892 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003710.x |
Popis: | Although the poaching of nestlings for the pet trade is thought to contribute to the decline of many species of parrots, its effects have been poorly demonstrated. We calculated rates of mortality due to nest poaching in 23 studies of Neotropical parrots, representing 4024 nesting attempts in 21 species and 14 coun- tries. We also examined how poaching rates vary with geographic region, presence of active protection pro- grams, conservation status and economic value of a species, and passage of the U.S. Wild Bird Conservation Act. The average poaching rate across all studies was 30% of all nests observed. Thirteen studies reported poaching rates of � 20%, and four reported rates of � 70%. Only six studies documented no nest poaching. Of these, four were conducted on islands in the Caribbean region, which had significantly lower poaching rates than the mainland Neotropics. The other two studies that showed no poaching were conducted on the two species with the lowest economic value in our sample (U.S. retail price). In four studies that allowed direct comparison between poaching at sites with active nest protection versus that at unprotected sites, poaching rates were significantly lower at protected sites, suggesting that active protection efforts can be effective in re |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |