EXAMINING RATING SOURCE VARIATION IN WORK BEHAVIOR TO KSA LINKAGES

Autor:	Lance Anderson, Laura E. Baranowski
Rok vydání:	2005
Předmět:	Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management Variation (linguistics) Work behavior law Variance components Generalizability theory Linkage (mechanical) Psychology Social psychology Applied Psychology Reliability (statistics) law.invention
Zdroj:	Personnel Psychology. 58:1041-1054
ISSN:	1744-6570 0031-5826
DOI:	10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00234.x
Popis:	We examined Work Behavior to knowledge, skill, or ability linkage ratings for 9 jobs to determine the degree to which differences in the ratings were due to rater type. We collected ratings from incumbents and 2 types of job analysts: project job analysts (analysts knowledgeable of the job) and nonproject job analysts (analysts with very little or no knowledge of the job). In our analyses of the data, we calculated means, standard deviations, effect sizes, and correlations for each rater type, as well as compared the reliability of the ratings. We also estimated variance components for each job by conducting generalizability analyses (Brennan, 1983; Shavelson, Webb, & Rowley, 1989). Our findings indicate that the level of linkage ratings is similar across rater types, that it is important to obtain ratings from multiple raters regardless of rater type, and that ratings from job analysts may be more reliable than those of incumbents.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8dfad10ec1f07c566e7f587487a1bfe0 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00234.x Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.