Sweet Charity, revisited: Organizational responses to food insecurity in Hamilton and Toronto, Canada
| Autor: | Carla Borstad Klassen, Sarah Wakefield, Ana Skinner, Julie Fleming |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2012 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Critical Social Policy. 33:427-450 |
| ISSN: | 1461-703X 0261-0183 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0261018312458487 |
| Popis: | In the last two decades, emergency food provision (e.g., food banks, meal programmes) has become an increasingly institutionalized form of hunger relief. Critiques of the emergency food system, as articulated by Poppendieck’s 1998 book Sweet Charity?, suggest that such programmes are unable to cope with growing hunger in a meaningful, stable, efficient, or culturally appropriate way, and that they may facilitate government retrenchment. Meanwhile, popular attention has increasingly focused on the environmental and social costs of our globalized industrial food system, and efforts to challenge it (e.g., urban fruit gleaning, chicken rearing) are becoming widespread. These efforts have drawn new kinds of organizations into the world of food (in)security. Drawing on organizational documents and key informant interviews, this paper examines how emergency food provision is changing because of the rise of ‘community food security’ discourse and practice in the period since Sweet Charity? Findings suggest that emergency food providers have responded to critiques in partial and incongruent ways. Organizations face structural constraints that curtail their ability to reorganize, while new kinds of organizations are engaging in community food security projects, both challenging and reinforcing the charity food model in ways that have relevance for progressive (food) organizing more generally. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|