| Popis: |
espanolCarlo Michelstaedter (Gorizia, 1887-1910) dejo una estela singular en la filosofia italiana de principios del S. XX. A casi ciento once anos de su fenecimiento, de su suicidio, todavia se puede discutir la influencia del pensador italiano, la vitalidad de sus topicos y la profundidad de su pensamiento. Nuestro proposito sera conocer la figura que subsiste detras del pensador de La persuasion y la retorica. En virtud de este objetivo, realizaremos un recorrido por su obra filosofica, epistolar y poetica, que sin dudas no basta; sin embargo, nos ayudara a echar luz sobre la fascinante creacion del ultimo medico del nihilismo, el ultimo gran diagnostico de la honda falta de sentido que acarreo la segunda parte del S. XIX e inauguro la primera decada del S. XX. Al modo de una elegia, quiza tambien de una oda, recordaremos al filosofo italiano en estos tiempos, ya que sigue siendo una empresa fructifera, inacabada y sumamente misteriosa. En conclusion, intentaremos defender a Michelstaedter de las lecturas meramente suicidas y nos aproximaremos hacia una interpretacion en cuatro tiempos del filosofo italiano. EnglishCarlo Michelstaedter (Gorizia, 1887-1910) left a singular trail in the Italian philosophy of the early 20th century. Almost one hundred and eleven years after his demise, his suicide, one can still discuss the influence of the Italian thinker, the vitality of their topics and the depth of their thinking. Our purpose is to know the figure that subsists behind the thinker of Persuasion and Rhetoric. In accordance with this objective, we will make a tour of his philosophical, epistolary and poetic work, which is certainly not enough. However, it will help us to shed light on the fas-cinating creation of the last doctor of nihilism, the last great diagnosis of the profound lack of sense that carried the second part of the S. XIX and inaugurated the first decade of the S. XX. In the form of an elegy, perhaps even an ode, we will remember the Italian philosopher in these times, for he remains a fruitful, unfinished and extremely mysterious undertaking. In conclusion, we will try to defend Michelstaedter from merely suicidal readings and approach a four-time interpretation of the Italian philosopher. |
