| Autor: |
juanruanoruiz not provided, not provided Pedro J Gómez Arias, not provided Jesús Gay-Mimbrera, not provided Macarena Aguilar-Luque, not provided Salvador Peiró Moreno, not provided Beatriz Isla-Tejera |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| DOI: |
10.17504/protocols.io.bs3kngkw |
| Popis: |
Hypothesis The degree of transparency and reproducibility of economic health analyses, whether primary studies or systematic reviews and meta-analysis, which are used for development could condition the usefulness of clinical practice guidelines in which they are included regardless of the methodological quality of them. Objectives Primary objective Analyze the relationship between the methodological quality of clinical practice guides published in Spain and the current state of reproducibility and transparency of the health economic assessment studies included in them, both primary studies or systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Secondary objectives Evaluate the quality of CFCs produced in Spain in the period 2000-2020. Evaluate the methodological quality of the economic assessment studies included in the GPCs produced in Spain in the period 2000-2020. Describe the transparency and reproducibility of the selected economic assessment studies. Analyse whether there are differences in transparency and reproducibility of economic assessment studies depending on the quality of the GPCs that include them. Analyse whether there have been improvements in the transparency and reproducibility of economic assessment studies by comparing the GPCs containing them that have been produced in 2000-2012 vs 2013-2020. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
