| Popis: |
Three studies were conducted to investigate how cattle determine where to begin a foraging bout. Studies were designed to measure (1) the inherent tendency of cattle to shift after a successful foraging bout, and (2) the way cattle cognitively change foraging strategies in response to a change in food availability. The apparatus was a Y-maze. Cattle were placed in a start box, allowed to enter either arm of the maze and consume food at the end of the arm alley. One trial consisted of two or three choices. After consumption of a certain amount of food, cattle were returned to the start box and allowed to choose either arm. On the second choice, cattle were allowed to consume all the food (depletion) remaining in the feed box. On the third choice, therefore, cattle had to choose an arm other than the second choice in order to get food. A return to the previous arm was recorded as a ‘stay’. Choice of the other arm was recorded as a ‘shift’. The strategy of each cow was determined using the binomial test. Since cattle could get food (winning situation) on the first choice, the strategies were termed ‘win-stay’ or ‘win-shift’. Initially, cattle displayed either random behavior or a win-stay strategy. Lateral preferences on the first choice were also determined using the binomial test. When cattle did not exhibit a lateral preference, the one-sample runs test was used for further analysis. When cattle were faced with a losing possibility, because food was depleted, they increased the frequency with which they used a win-shift strategy. They continued to shift, even after the possibility of losing was removed. The possibility of losing seems to be very important in decision making of cattle. Apparently, cattle do not have an inherent tendency to shift after a successful bout. Cattle learned strategies to deal with the task. |
Full Text from ScienceDirect