the babel of European Union studies: beyond the trans-Atlantic divide
| Autor: | Mads Christian Dagnis Jensen, Peter Marcus Kristensen |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Vocabulary
Sociology of scientific knowledge media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Comparative politics Quantitative content analysis 050601 international relations 0506 political science Political science Political Science and International Relations 050602 political science & public administration media_common.cataloged_instance Political philosophy European union Social science Discipline Positivism media_common |
| Zdroj: | European Political Science. 17:437-465 |
| ISSN: | 1682-0983 1680-4333 |
| DOI: | 10.1057/s41304-017-0125-8 |
| Popis: | This article examines four lines of scholarly difference in European Union (EU) studies – meta-theoretical, (sub)disciplinary, epistemological and methodological – and whether these are linked to the geographical and institutional affiliations of the authors operating in the field. The study uses a novel dataset based on a quantitative content analysis and human coding of 1597 articles in leading journals dealing with the EU published in the period 2003–2012. The article shows that USA-based scholars score on average – though in many cases, not significantly – higher when it comes to indicators of a comparative politics approach to the EU, use of a rational choice, positivist and statistical vocabulary, and articles coded as quantitative. However, on most of these indicators scholars in some European countries, and especially some institutions, score significantly higher, suggesting that we should disaggregate ‘Europe’ when discussing scholarly differences in the field. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink