Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease
| Autor: | Damiano Caruso, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Shivraman Giri, Taylor M. Duguay, Giuseppe Muscogiuri, Akos Varga-Szemes, Julian L. Wichmann, Christian Tesche, Thomas M. Todoran, Carlo N. De Cecco, Sheldon E. Litwin, U. Joseph Schoepf, Pal Suranyi, Ricardo Yamada |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Image quality Abdominal aorta Digital subtraction angiography 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology medicine.disease Magnetic resonance angiography Confidence interval 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences Stenosis 0302 clinical medicine medicine.artery Angiography medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging cardiovascular diseases Radiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Nuclear medicine Computed tomography angiography |
| Zdroj: | JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 10:1116-1124 |
| ISSN: | 1936-878X |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.030 |
| Popis: | Objectives This study sought to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) versus iodine-contrast computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), with invasive digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. Background QISS is a recently introduced noncontrast MRA technique. Although the diagnostic accuracy of QISS is reportedly similar to that of contrast-enhanced MRA, its performance compared with contrast-enhanced CTA, the most frequently used noninvasive modality for evaluation of PAD, is unknown. Methods Thirty patients (66 ± 7 years of age) with PAD underwent lower extremity CTA with third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT and 1.5-T MRA using a prototype noncontrast QISS sequence. DSA was performed within 50 days. The abdominal aorta and lower extremity run-off were imaged. Eighteen arterial segments were analyzed. Subjective image quality (3-point Likert scale) and stenosis (5-point grading) were evaluated by 2 observers and compared using the Mann–Whitney U and chi-square tests, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of MRA and CTA for >50% stenosis detection were compared using the McNemar-test. Results Of 540 segments, 15 (2.8%) and 42 (7.8%) inconclusive segments were excluded from MRA and CTA analysis, respectively (p = 0.0006). The DSA results were available for 410 of the remaining segments. Overall subjective image quality was rated similarly with QISS-MRA (2.52 [95% confidence interval: 2.46 to 2.57]) and CTA (2.49 [95% confidence interval: 2.43 to 2.55]; p = 0.5062). The sensitivity and specificity of MRA for >50% stenosis were 84.9% and 97.2%, respectively, similar to those of CTA (87.3% and 95.4%, respectively). Interobserver agreement for stenosis detection was excellent for MRA (κ > 0.81) and CTA (κ > 0.81). Conclusions Noncontrast QISS-MRA provides high diagnostic accuracy compared with DSA, while being less prone to image artifacts than CTA. QISS better visualizes heavily calcified segments with impaired flow. QISS-MRA obviates the need for contrast administration in PAD patients. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|