Popis: |
Lumbar spinal fusion is an effective treatment for various pathologies, including degenerative conditions. With an aging population, the demand for spinal fusion procedures continues to increase. The morbidities associated with the traditional open midline techniques for spinal fusion, such as significant blood loss and prolonged hospitalization, may warrant consideration of alternative minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches. First described by Foley in 2003 [1], MIS techniques have become more widely utilized with the potential benefits of less structural damage to paraspinal tissues and faster postoperative recovery. As with any new surgical method, the associated learning curve requires time, potentially increasing the length of the operation and complication rates. To date, many studies have reported the outcomes of MIS lumbar fusion as well as the comparative analysis of open versus MIS approaches. |