Numerical study on the performance of rounded corners on the top of electronic components on cooling effectiveness
| Autor: | A. Khelil, M. Bedrouni |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
Jet (fluid) Materials science Mechanical Engineering Rounding Reynolds number Geometry 02 engineering and technology Radius 021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology Condensed Matter Physics 01 natural sciences 010305 fluids & plasmas symbols.namesake visual_art 0103 physical sciences Heat transfer Electronic component symbols Shear stress visual_art.visual_art_medium Cube 0210 nano-technology |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 150:119391 |
| ISSN: | 0017-9310 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119391 |
| Popis: | The importance of this research is to explore and discuss the effects of rounding the top corners of electronic components which are subjected to a cross-flow and a perpendicular impinging jet on the cooling efficiency. Simulations were performed at a cross-flow Reynolds number of 3410 and three different impinging-to-cross-flow Reynolds number ratios ( α = 0.5 , 1 a n d 1.5 ). Four cubic geometries, based on the radius of the top corner, were investigated. The principal aim of this study is to find out the effects of the rounded corner on coherent structures and cooling improvement. The Shear Stress Transport (SST) K–ω model is implemented. Moreover, the assessment of this simulation is investigated by comparison with available experimental data. It should be emphasized that the high mesh resolution was handled where the wall-normal coordinate value is suitable (herein 0.01 ≤ y + ≤ 0.19 for the cube wall). The obtained numerical results are in good agreement with the experimental data. The flow features and coherent structures developed closer to the components considerably influence the wall heat transfer. Additionally, it is found that rounding top corners of the cube can improve the cooling efficiency for α = 1 a n d 1.5 by more than 6% and 23% respectively when compared to a regular cube. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect