22 Public and patient involvement in prehospital care research development – designing the rapid 2 trial
| Autor: | Steve Goodacre, Alan Watkins, Simon Ford, Theresa Foster, M Robinson, Nigel Rees, Bridie Evans, L Parry, Mirella Longo, Leigh Keen, Helen Snooks, Ronan A Lyons, Ian Pallister, Jenna Bulger, Sian Jones, Niro Siriwardena |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Hip fracture
business.industry Conflict of interest Pain management Research management medicine.disease 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Incentive Nursing medicine Attrition Research development 030212 general & internal medicine Patient group business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Abstracts. |
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-ems.22 |
| Popis: | Background Involving patients and public members in research helps ensure evidence is relevant, accountable and high quality. Public and patient involvement (PPI) is required in many funding applications. We aimed to involve public contributors in designing a research bid about prehospital management for hip fracture. Method We recruited two public contributors with experience of hip fracture and prehospital care to our research team of academic, clinical and managerial partners developing the RAPID 2 proposal evaluating paramedic administration of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block, a local anesthetic injection into the hip. We supported them to consult with a public/patient group and identify patient priorities to inform our decisions. We held research development meetings and shared project drafts to gain views, share decisions and amend documents. Results Consultation responses suggested patient priorities after hip fracture were to return home, recover mobility and gain independence. These views guided our decisions on setting primary outcomes which were length-of-hospital-stay and health-related quality-of-life. Their concern about the study design causing delayed access to treatment meant we decided to identify common exclusion criteria before randomisation to expedite access to pain management and reduce attrition. Public contributors also agreed patients should be offered an incentive for completing and returning questionnaires to enhance data completeness. Conclusion Involving public contributors enabled the research team to identify patient-prioritised outcomes and adjust the proposed study design to reflect these in the proposal. Public contributors will remain involved if funding is awarded to ensure patient perspectives inform all stages of research management and dissemination. Conflict of interest None. Funding PRIME Centre Wales. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|