New Media for Science: Key Features of Platforms with Open Peer Review

Autor:	Angelina Gorbunova, Ivan Ivanovich Zassoursky, Nataliia Trishchenko
Rok vydání:	2021
Předmět:	World Wide Web 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Computer science 05 social sciences 0509 other social sciences 050904 information & library sciences Key features 030217 neurology & neurosurgery New media
Zdroj:	Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism. 10:22-38
ISSN:	2308-6211 2308-6203
Popis:	The article deals with open peer reviewing as a new way of verifying results of researches in the scientific sector of digital media. The technological modernization of scientific publishers provides for solving some of the problems of the traditional peer reviewing. This explains the topicality of the study. The authors analyzed ten platforms with open peer review that are based in Europe, the USA and Canada. According to the results, a formally similar open peer review process may vary depending on the scope of authority a scientific community has, reviewers’ identification, authors’ opportunities to propose an expert, the degree of review openness, posting the revised versions, and involvement of the editorial board if any. The tools that the platforms use to encourage the scientific community to participate in commenting and reviewing the publications also matter. One of the key advantages of open peer reviewing is reducing the time required for publishing an article, which is crucial for some scientific fields.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::82e2fc300943baf0cd45875a953745e5 https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2021.10(1).22-38 Zobrazit plný text záznamu