A Manikin Study Comparing McGrath Mac®and Airtraq®with Macintosh Laryngoscope in Tracheal Intubation by Intensive Care Unit Doctors

Autor: OF Wong, Gwm Kwan, Hkw Chan
Rok vydání: 2015
Předmět:
Zdroj: Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine. 22:337-344
ISSN: 2309-5407
1024-9079
DOI: 10.1177/102490791502200601
Popis: ObjectiveTo compare the performance of the McGrath Mac®and the Airtraq®with the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation.DesignA manikin study with different simulated difficult airway scenarios.MethodsThirty intensive care unit (ICU) doctors (10 specialists and 20 non-specialists) performed intubation by using the 3 airway devices in the manikin with (i) normal airway, (ii) cervical rigidity, and (iii) tongue oedema. The intubation time, success rate, oesophageal intubation and number of episodes of dental injury were measured and compared.ResultsThe mean intubation time was significantly less by using the Airtraq®comparing to the McGrath Mac®in the manikin with normal airway (12.77 sec vs. 24.23 sec; p®when comparing to the McGrath Mac®in the manikin with cervical rigidity (12.73 sec vs. 17.5 sec; p=0.013). In the scenario of simulated tongue oedema, the mean intubation time of Airtraq®was shorter than Macintosh laryngoscope (24.83 sec vs. 34.20 sec; p=0.011) while there was no difference between Airtraq®and the McGrath Mac®. Less dental injury was noted when using the Airtraq®compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated cervical rigidity (p=0.005) and tongue oedema (p®compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated tongue oedema (pConclusionEven with prior limited experience in using the McGrath Mac®, the performance of tracheal intubation by using this new device is comparable with the Airtraq®. The McGrath Mac®can be a good alternative for tracheal intubation in difficult airway situations. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2015;22:337-344)
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: