Brooding and Reflection as Subtypes of Rumination: Evidence from Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Nonclinical Samples using the Dutch Ruminative Response Scale

Autor:	Hanne Schoofs, Filip Raes, Dirk Hermans
Rok vydání:	2010
Předmět:	medicine.medical_treatment Discriminant validity Poison control Test validity Confirmatory factor analysis Clinical Psychology Scale (social sciences) Rumination medicine Cognitive therapy medicine.symptom Psychology Reliability (statistics) Clinical psychology
Zdroj:	Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 32:609-617
ISSN:	1573-3505 0882-2689
DOI:	10.1007/s10862-010-9182-9
Popis:	Previous research has shown that depressive rumination is an important vulnerability factor for experiencing depressive symptoms. The most widely used measure to assess depressive rumination is the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS). According to Treynor et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research 27:247–259, 2003), the RRS contains two subscales, reflecting two different rumination subcomponents: brooding and reflection. The present study examined the psychometric properties of the RRS in two samples (N = 432 and N = 407). Based on a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), results confirmed that a two-dimensional model with brooding and reflection factors provided an adequate fit to the data. Reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of the rumination subcomponents were appropriate. Furthermore, brooding but not reflection predicted depressive symptoms prospectively, even when accounting for concurrent depressive feelings. The results provide the first confirmatory factor-analytical support for the widely assumed two-factor model of the RRS and add to the accumulating body of evidence supporting the multidimensional nature of depressive rumination.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::8172a9cc8701edb3deccebd4f234cca2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-010-9182-9 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Full text from SpringerLink