| Popis: |
Underground Waste Container systems are systems that provide to collect all wastes and wastes under the ground working in confined spaces and in vertical position and that prevent spread of scent and water around. Underground waste containers have many advantages compared to conventional waste containers. These are; to prevent the formation of viruses and bacteria based illnesses that may be exposed due to the inner coating of the tank under the ground, to save space, to save time in the collection of waste, to collect the waste hygienically and untouchedly. Moreover, it contributes to recycling due to on-site waste separation with more than one container taking small place. The use of underground waste containers with many advantages is increasing. In this respect, the aim of this paper is to define the criteria that are effective in placing underground waste containers, to calculate the criteria weights and to evaluate alternative locations where waste containers will be placed for a particular region. As a result of the literature review, there was no study about the location selection for underground waste containers. In this study, the integrated MC-HFLTS&MAIRCA method is used for assessing and choosing the best location for underground waste containers. This method can increase the flexibility of representing linguistic information and it can reflect in defining the gap between the ideal and empirical ponders. According to the results obtained, the most important criterion was determined as Suitability of infrastructure (C 5 ), followed by Amount of waste (C 3 ), and respectively Population density (C 2 ), Number of institution of public/private utility (C 4 ) and Distance to waste disposal point (C 1 ). The alternative order is as A 3 >A 1 >A 2 . According to the results obtained in the calculation, the first location for under ground waste containers is district of Yakutiye (A 3 ) and neighborhood of Lalapasa (B 3 ). The comparison analysis is done using MABAC method to check the validity of the results. In the MC-HFLTS&MAIRCA and MC-HFLTS&MABAC methods, A 3 and B 3 alternatives are the best one and the ranking of location for underground waste containers is the same. |
