Revues prédatrices : une vraie menace pour la recherche médicale. 2 Evaluer leurs conséquences et engager une riposte
| Autor: | Nathan Peiffer-Smadja, H. Maisonneuve, F Barde, A. de La Blanchardière |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
business.industry
media_common.quotation_subject Gastroenterology International community Public relations Medical research 03 medical and health sciences Politics 0302 clinical medicine Work (electrical) Publishing Political science Sustainability Internal Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine business Scientific misconduct 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Reputation media_common |
| Zdroj: | La Revue de Médecine Interne. 42:427-433 |
| ISSN: | 0248-8663 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.revmed.2021.03.327 |
| Popis: | The deleterious consequences of "predatory" journals are numerous, whether the researcher submitted his work to them naively or knowingly: work little or not read by the international community in the absence of indexing and disappearance of any digital trace in the absence of archiving. The reputation of researchers but also of universities and research organizations and the credit of science for citizens can be sustainably damaged. These open access journals, with the author who pays as model, represent as many resources unavailable for legitimate journals. A joint mobilization of all the actors involved is necessary: researchers, universities and faculties of medicine, sections of the national university council, publishers of legitimate journals, research organizations, learned societies, ethics committees, funders, media and political decision-makers. Publishing in a predatory journal is now a scientific misconduct. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect