Difference between calibration and practical force proving instruments
| Autor: | Hamad Alghamdi, Seif M. Osman, Gouda M. Mahmoud, Abdulelah A. Binown |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Universitas Scientiarum. 26:67-77 |
| ISSN: | 2027-1352 0122-7483 |
| DOI: | 10.11144/javeriana.sc26-1.dbca |
| Popis: | This is an experimental work on seventy load cells which aims to highlight the difference between results out of force, proving instruments calibration according to ISO 376:2011 and its practical use. It spots on the difference between the relative error of repeatability and reproducibility and their contributions on load cells classifications, uncertainty estimation and calibration time. Results show that there is no significant effect for relative error of repeatability on load cell classification, ignoring the relative repeatability error in estimating the relative expanded uncertainty lead to decrease with values between 1 ppm and 270 ppm in the range from 20 % to 50 % of load cell capacity and by values between 1 ppm and 183 ppm in the range from 50 % to 100 % of the load cell capacity. It is concluded that performing measurements to calculate the relative error of repeatability is not effective in the normal calibration process for the examined seventy load cells, further measurements over subsequent years are recommended to ensure results reproducibility aiming to generalize the conclusion and recommend measurements for the relative repeatability error for load cell conformity assessment after manufacturing. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|