Rarely pure and never simple: Assessing cumulative evidence in strategic management

Autor:	Robert J. David, Scott L. Newbert, Shin-Kap Han
Rok vydání:	2014
Předmět:	Transaction cost Process (engineering) Strategy and Management Vote counting Education Industrial relations Resource-based view Economics Strategic management Business and International Management Positive economics Marketing Empirical evidence Strengths and weaknesses Simple (philosophy)
Zdroj:	Strategic Organization. 12:142-154
ISSN:	1741-315X 1476-1270
DOI:	10.1177/1476127014529895
Popis:	As empirical evidence in strategy has accumulated, scholars have shown increasing interest in assessing the empirical record of leading theories. Two methods of assessment have figured prominently: vote counting and meta-analysis. Recently, critics have denounced the former in favor of the latter. While meta-analysis is certainly a powerful assessment tool, we argue that both vote counting and meta-analysis are characterized by certain strengths and weaknesses and that these methods should be seen as complementary means of understanding bodies of empirical evidence. We provide guidance regarding when to employ each method and how to improve the process of cumulative assessment.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::7f6a35643ad2ad23a445853328ba3373 https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014529895 Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text ve formátu PDF Plný text ve formátu HTML
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje	K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit.