Abstract 1: Did Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy Outcomes Change Over Time in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial?

Autor: George Howard, Gary S Roubin, L. Nelson Hopkins, Wesley S Moore, William A Gray, Kenneth Rosenfield, Barry T Katzen, Elie Chakhtoura, William F Morrish, Robert D Ferguson, Robert J Hye, Fayaz A Shawl, Mark R Harrigan, Jenifer H Voeks, Brajesh K Lal, James F Meschia, Thomas G Brott
Rok vydání: 2012
Předmět:
Zdroj: Stroke. 43
ISSN: 1524-4628
0039-2499
DOI: 10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a1
Popis: Background The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) enrolled 2502 patients between December of 2000 and mid-July of 2008. We analyzed temporal changes in outcomes for both CEA and CAS over the course of this study. Methods Enrollment was divided into 3 consecutive epochs (5 years, 14 months, and 16 months), each with approximately 834 patients ( Table ). Rates for the primary outcome of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (DSMI) and for death and stroke (DS) during the periprocedural period were calculated. Poisson regression was used to adjust rates for age, sex, dyslipidemia, and symptomatic status, all of which were found to influence outcomes. Results For CAS, there was a 26% decline in DSMI (6.2% → 4.6%) and a 35% decline in DS (5.5% → 3.6%). For both composite endpoints in CEA there was no consistent pattern ( Table ). As CREST progressed, it enrolled younger patients, more men, patients more likely to be dyslipidemic and enrolled more asymptomatic patients (all p < 0.05). Adjustment for these changes mediated the improvement in event rates for the CAS patients, and had no consistent effect on CEA event rates ( Table ). Conclusion Periprocedural safety for CAS improved over time in CREST. Changes were inconsistent for CEA. Improvements for CAS in part appear to reflect changes in patient selection related to age, sex, and risk factors, as adjustment for those variables attenuated the decline in rates. Linking rates to operator experience was not feasible because of the large number of new interventionalists and surgeons entering CREST over time.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: