Conception, sense, and reference in Peircean semiotics
Autor: | Risto Hilpinen |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Synthese. 192:991-1018 |
ISSN: | 1573-0964 0039-7857 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11229-013-0326-9 |
Popis: | In his Logical Investigations Edmund Husserl criticizes John Stuart Mill’s account of meaning as connotation, especially Mill’s failure to separate the distinction between connotative and non-connotative names from the distinction between the meaningful and the meaningless. According to Husserl, both connotative and non-connotative names have meaning or “signification”, that is, what Gottlob Frege calls the sense (“Sinn”) of an expression. The distinction between connotative and non-connotative names is a distinction between two kinds of meaning (or sense), attributive and non-attributive meaning (“attributive und nicht-attributive Bedeutung”). Attributive (connotative) names denote (refer to) objects through their attributes, whereas a non-attributive name means a thing directly (“direkt”). In this paper I examine the concepts of attributive and non-attributive meaning by means of the semiotic theory of Charles S. Peirce, and compare Peirce’s account with the views of Frege, Husserl, Alexius Meinong, and David Kaplan and Gareth Evans. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |