From Berman and Hafner’s teleological context to Baude and Sachs’ interpretive defaults: an ontological challenge for the next decades of AI and Law
| Autor: | Ronald P. Loui |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2016 |
| Předmět: |
Computer science
Context (language use) 06 humanities and the arts 02 engineering and technology 0603 philosophy ethics and religion Legal realism Meaning (philosophy of language) Artificial Intelligence Teleology Law 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering 020201 artificial intelligence & image processing Case-based reasoning 060301 applied ethics Defeasible reasoning Philosophy of law Constitutional law |
| Zdroj: | Artificial Intelligence and Law. 24:371-385 |
| ISSN: | 1572-8382 0924-8463 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10506-016-9186-1 |
| Popis: | This paper revisits the challenge of Berman and Hafner's "missing link" paper on representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning. It is noted that this was mainly an ontological challenge to represent some of what made legal reasoning distinctive, which was given less attention than factual similarity in the dominant AI and Law paradigm, deriving from HYPO. The response to their paper is noted and briefly evaluated. A parallel is drawn to a new challenge to provide deep structure to the legal context of textual meaning, drawing on the forthcoming work of two Constitutional law scholars who appear to place some faith in the ways of thinking that AI and Law has developed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink