Balancing Competences? Proportionality as an Instrument to Regulate the Exercise of Competences after the PSPP Judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht

Autor:	Niels Petersen, Konstantin Chatziathanasiou
Rok vydání:	2021
Předmět:	media_common.quotation_subject Law Political science Common law Control (management) Proportionality (law) Context (language use) Safeguarding Economic Justice Autonomy media_common Standard of review
Zdroj:	European Constitutional Law Review. 17:314-334
ISSN:	1744-5515 1574-0196
DOI:	10.1017/s1574019621000201
Popis:	Analysis of proportionality in the context of Article 5 TEU after the PSPP judgment – Bundesverfassungsgericht challenging Court of Justice to control European Central Bank’s motives – Doctrinal tradition of ‘smoking out’ illicit motives through proportionality – Article 5(4) TEU: proportionality of exercise of competences, primarily safeguarding member states’ autonomy – Court of Justice case law on proportionality: deferential standard of review towards measures of EU institutions – Bundesverfassungsgericht case law on federal competences and municipal autonomy: less deferential but still respectful standard of review – PSPP inconsistent with case law and with Article 5 TEU – Balancing-stage of proportionality unsuitable for motive control
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::778fae864ed9538f32cc3ed18857c481 https://doi.org/10.1017/s1574019621000201 Zobrazit plný text záznamu