Salvage radiotherapy after chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in real world
| Autor: | Yaping Xu, Min Hu, Qinghua Xu, Xiao-Shuai Yuan, Hui Liu, Fangjuan Li |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty Chemotherapy business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Locally advanced medicine.disease Concurrent chemoradiotherapy Oncology Salvage radiotherapy Medicine Combined Modality Therapy Radiology Non small cell Stage (cooking) business Lung cancer human activities |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Clinical Oncology. 38:e21052-e21052 |
| ISSN: | 1527-7755 0732-183X |
| Popis: | e21052 Background: For patients with unresectable stage III disease, combined modality therapy (chemoradiation) is superior to radiation alone, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is superior to sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT). The current standard of care for unresectable stage III disease is CCRT. Consequently, CCRT is commonly given to patients with minimal or no comorbidities, a good general condition, and who are relatively young. SCRT may be a valuable alternative for patients who are not eligible for CCRT. However, the role of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after chemotherapy for patients with unresectable stage III disease without CCRT or SCRT is currently unknown. Methods: Patients with unresectable stage III disease receiving chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. All patients were treated with CCRT, SCRT or SRT. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: From May 2014 to September 2018, 216 patients were enrolled, including 65 (30.1%) who received CCRT, 80 (37.0%) who received SCRT, and 71 (32.9%) who received SRT. No significant difference in gender, age, performance status, TNM stage, or EGFR gene status among the three groups. The median OS for the entire cohort was 22.1 (range: 18.4–25.8) months. The median OS in CCRT, SCRT, and SRT group were 29.7, 21.3, and 19.1 months, respectively (P = 0.011). The difference was statistically significant between CCRT group and SCRT or SRT group but was not between SCRT and SRT group. The 1-year survival rate in CCRT, SCRT, and SRT group were 89.2%, 75.0%, and 75.2%, respectively. However, the 3-year survival rate in CCRT, SCRT, and SRT group were 42.7%, 32.7%, and 9.6%, respectively. However, CCRT also has a higher rate of Grade 3 or 4 acute esophagitis and pneumonitis . Conclusions: The current study demonstrated compared with CCRT and SCRT, SRT had reduced patient survival survival time significantly. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|