Evidenz für psychoanalytisch begründete Verfahren für Kinder und Jugendliche
| Autor: | Svenja Taubner, Carola Cropp, Renate Schepker, Christina Pranjic, Anette Müller, Cornelia Stingl, Helene Timmermann, Eberhard Windaus, Annette Streeck-Fischer, Bettina Meisel, Maya K. Krischer, Sven Rabung, Klaus-Thomas Kronmüller, Tanja Müller-Göttken, Günter Reich |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
050103 clinical psychology
Psychodynamic psychotherapy Empirical data Psychotherapist 05 social sciences Psychodynamics Systemic therapy language.human_language 3. Good health 030227 psychiatry German 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine language medicine Anxiety 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences medicine.symptom Empirical evidence Psychology Systematic search |
| Zdroj: | Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie. 70:479-498 |
| ISSN: | 2196-8225 0032-7034 |
| DOI: | 10.13109/prkk.2021.70.6.479 |
| Popis: | In Germany, cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychodynamic therapy, and systemic therapy are scientifically and legally approved as suitable procedures for treating mental disorders. While all methods have provided empirical evidence of their effectiveness in adults according to defined criteria of the "Scientific Advisory Board for Psychotherapy" (in German: "Wissenschaftlicher Beirat Psychotherapie"), i. e., the official board which decides upon the formal scientific approval of psychotherapeutic approaches in Germany, an evaluation is lacking for the psychodynamic methods in children and adolescents. Against this background, we evaluated the available empirical data for psychodynamic therapy in children and adolescents based on the methods paper of the "Scientific Advisory Board for Psychotherapy" (2019; version 2.9). Published reviews served as the basis for identifying relevant studies, supplemented by a systematic literature search. We identified 91 potentially relevant studies but could not consider the majority of these due to formal exclusion criteria (mainly not disorder-specific, no control group). Up to 26 of the remaining studies provide evidence of efficacy as defined by the "Scientific Advisory Board for Psychotherapy". These cover 10 of the 18 areas of application as defined by the "Scientific Advisory Board for Psychotherapy". According to our evaluation, the reviewed studies provide empirical evidence for the three most relevant areas of application (i. e., affective disorders; anxiety disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorders; hyperkinetic disorders and conduct disorders). Thus, the available evidence supports the suitability of psychodynamic therapy as a method for the treatment of children and adolescents. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|