Power Doppler Ultrasonography and Shear Wave Elastography as Complementary Imaging Methods for Suspected Local Breast Cancer Recurrence
Autor: | Luis Otávio Sarian, Klaus Schumacher, Carlos A. Menossi, Mila Meneguelli Miranda, Rodrigo Menezes Jales, Maíra Teixeira Dória, Katia Piton Serra |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Shear wave elastography Radiological and Ultrasound Technology medicine.diagnostic_test Breast cancer recurrence business.industry Area under the curve medicine.disease Confidence interval 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences Power doppler 0302 clinical medicine Breast cancer 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Biopsy medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Radiology Elastography business |
Zdroj: | Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 37:1493-1501 |
ISSN: | 0278-4297 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jum.14493 |
Popis: | Objectives To prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical consequences of power Doppler morphologic criteria and shear wave elastography (SWE) as complementary imaging methods for evaluation of suspected local breast cancer recurrence in the ipsilateral breast or chest wall. Methods Thirty-two breast masses with a suspicion of local breast cancer recurrence on B-mode ultrasonography underwent complementary power Doppler and SWE evaluations. Power Doppler morphologic criteria were classified as avascular, hypovascular, or hypervascular. Shear wave elastography was classified according to a 5-point scale (SWE score) and SWE maximum elasticity. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. A decision curve analysis assessed clinical consequences of each method. The reference standard for diagnosis was defined as core needle or excisional biopsy. Results Histopathologic examinations revealed 9 (28.2%) benign and 23 (71.8%) malignant cases. Power Doppler ultrasonography (US) had sensitivity of 34.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6%-62.9%) and specificity of 45.4% (95% CI, 19.3%-71.5%). The SWE score (≥3) had sensitivity of 87.0% (95% CI, 66.4%-97.2%) and specificity of 44.4% (95% CI, 13.7%-78.8%). The SWE maximum elasticity (velocity > 6.5cm/s) had sensitivity of 87% (95% CI, 66.4%-97.2%) and specificity of 77.8% (95% CI, 40.0% to 97.2%). The areas under the curves for the SWE score and SWE maximum elasticity were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.53-0.87) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.64-0.93), respectively (P = .32). Conclusions Power Doppler US is unsuitable for discrimination between local breast cancer recurrence and fibrosis. Although the SWE score and SWE maximum elasticity can make this discrimination, the use of these methods to determine biopsy may lead to poorer clinical outcomes than the current practice of performing biopsies of all suspicious masses. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |