| Popis: |
Background The main limits of Grammont's reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) design are loss of external rotation and scapular notching. These limits can be addressed with glenoid and/or humeral lateralization. Currently, there is no uniformity in the literature regarding the best option to improves these outcomes. Lateralization of the humeral side should be an option. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes of a 145 degree onlay curved stem vs a 155 degree inlay straight stem. Methods A retrospective analysis of 96 consecutive patients undergoing RSA (98 shoulders) was performed. Of these, 47 patients (48 shoulders) underwent RSA with a Aequalis Reversed II Stem (Group A) and 49 (50 shoulders) with a lateralized humeral stem (Ascend Flex©) (Group B). The exclusion criteria included any relevant glenoid bone loss in the horizontal plane or vertical plane and patients with post-traumatic conditions including humeral head necrosis. Patient with teres minor fatty infiltration superior to grade 2 according to Goutallier's classification were also excluded. Constant score, muscular strength and range of motion (ROM), were evaluated preoperatively and for 2 years postoperatively. Radiographs were examined for scapular notching. Results Comparing clinical outcomes, there were significant improvements with active ROM using lateralized shoulder stem (Group B) in flexion, abduction and external rotation (P > .05). However, while evaluating the Constant score and muscular strength, no important difference emerged between the two groups. Scapular notching was observed in 29.17% of cases (24 shoulders) of Group A and in 12% of cases (6 shoulders) of Group B. Moreover, the average degree of notching was reduced in Group B in which the grade 1 was observed in 4 shoulders out of 50. Grade 2 was observed in 7 shoulders in Group A and in 2 shoulders in Group B. Grade 3 and grade 4 were observed only in 1 patient in Group A, and no one in Group B. Conclusions The lateralized humeral stem (145°, onlay, curved stem) in RSA improves ROM, particularly external rotation and abduction compared to Aequalis Reversed II Stem. No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding muscular strength. Both designs provide an overall improvement on function and pain relief. Moreover, the incidence of scapular notching is lower in a lateralized humeral stem implant (12% of cases) compared to traditional reverse prostheses with an Aequalis Reversed II Stem (29.17% of cases). Level of Evidence III |
Full Text from ScienceDirect